| Date | Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:20:57 +0100 | From | Will Deacon <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 12/26] arm64: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitions |
| |
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 05:01:20PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics, > and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock > pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific > arch_spin_unlock_wait(). > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> > Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 58 ++++----------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
I'm going to miss this code.
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Will
|