lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] x86/CPU/AMD: Present package as die instead of socket
    On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 04:42:32PM +0000, Duran, Leo wrote:

    First of all, please do not top-post.

    > Are you saying that "amd.c' should be scheduler-aware?.. Really?

    Please read again what I said.

    > If so, are you saying that information returned by kernel-defined
    > terms like 'Package', 'Core',

    "information returned by kernel-defined terms"... hmmm, I don't know
    what that means.

    > etc, should done in the context of understanding the scheduler, rather
    > than in the context what is being documented for those terms to
    > actually mean or represent.

    -ENOPARSE.

    > I'd hope that "amd.c" should be doing the latter... and that perhaps
    > we're simply not returning information as specified by the intended
    > definition of those terms (in which case we need to fix our code)

    -ENOPARSE.

    I can't really understand what you're trying to tell me here.

    --
    Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

    Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-06-27 18:47    [W:3.464 / U:0.268 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site