lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Hi,

On 21/06/17 10:16, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> We can reuse "cap_parsing_failed" instead of keeping an additional
> variable here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index d1c33a85059e..8239a6232808 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ int __init topology_parse_cpu_capacity(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> static cpumask_var_t cpus_to_visit;
> -static bool cap_parsing_done;
> static void parsing_done_workfn(struct work_struct *work);
> static DECLARE_WORK(parsing_done_work, parsing_done_workfn);
>
> @@ -173,7 +172,7 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
> int cpu;
>
> - if (cap_parsing_failed || cap_parsing_done)
> + if (cap_parsing_failed)
> return 0;
>
> switch (val) {
> @@ -193,7 +192,7 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> topology_normalize_cpu_scale();
> kfree(raw_capacity);
> pr_debug("cpu_capacity: parsing done\n");
> - cap_parsing_done = true;
> + cap_parsing_failed = true;

But we didn't actually failed here, right?

Thanks,

- Juri

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-22 20:01    [W:0.166 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site