lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH NET] net/hns:bugfix of ethtool -t phy self_test
From
Date
Hi, Andrew

On 2017/6/21 11:13, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:03:29AM +0800, l00371289 wrote:
>> Hi, Andrew
>>
>> On 2017/6/20 21:27, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:05:54AM +0800, l00371289 wrote:
>>>> hi, Florian
>>>>
>>>> On 2017/6/20 5:00, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>> On 06/16/2017 02:24 AM, Lin Yun Sheng wrote:
>>>>>> This patch fixes the phy loopback self_test failed issue. when
>>>>>> Marvell Phy Module is loaded, it will powerdown fiber when doing
>>>>>> phy loopback self test, which cause phy loopback self_test fail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lin Yun Sheng <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_ethtool.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_ethtool.c
>>>>>> index b8fab14..e95795b 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_ethtool.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_ethtool.c
>>>>>> @@ -288,9 +288,15 @@ static int hns_nic_config_phy_loopback(struct phy_device *phy_dev, u8 en)
>>>>>
>>>>> The question really is, why is not this properly integrated into the PHY
>>>>> driver and PHYLIB such that the only thing the Ethernet MAC driver has
>>>>> to call is a function of the PHY driver putting it in self-test?
>>>> Do you meaning calling phy_dev->drv->resume and phy_dev->drv->suspend function?
>>>
>>> No. Florian is saying you should add support for phylib and the
>>> drivers to enable/disable loopback.
>>>
>>> The BMCR loopback bit is pretty much standardised. So you can
>>> implement a genphy_loopback(phydev, enable), which most drivers can
>>> use. Those that need there own can implement it in there driver.
>>
>> I tried to add the genphy_loopback support you mentioned, please look
>> at it if that is what you mean. If Yes, I will try to send out a new patch.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Yinsheng Lin
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> index 1219eea..54fecad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> @@ -1628,6 +1628,31 @@ static int gen10g_resume(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +int genphy_loopback(struct phy_device *phydev, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + int value;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
>
> Do you look at the other genphy_ functions? How many take the mutex?
only genphy_suspend and genphy_resume take the mutex, I will have to
remove the lock taking, right?

>
>> + if (enable) {
>> + value = phy_read(phydev, MII_BMCR);
>> + phy_write(phydev, MII_BMCR, value | BMCR_LOOPBACK);
>> + } else {
>> + value = phy_read(phydev, MII_BMCR);
>> + phy_write(phydev, MII_BMCR, value & ~BMCR_LOOPBACK);
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(genphy_loopback);
>> +
>> +static int gen10g_loopback(struct phy_device *phydev, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int __set_phy_supported(struct phy_device *phydev, u32 max_speed)
>> {
>> /* The default values for phydev->supported are provided by the PHY
>> @@ -1874,6 +1899,7 @@ void phy_drivers_unregister(struct phy_driver *drv, int n)
>> .read_status = genphy_read_status,
>> .suspend = genphy_suspend,
>> .resume = genphy_resume,
>> + .set_loopback = genphy_loopback,
>> }, {
>> .phy_id = 0xffffffff,
>> .phy_id_mask = 0xffffffff,
>> @@ -1885,6 +1911,7 @@ void phy_drivers_unregister(struct phy_driver *drv, int n)
>> .read_status = gen10g_read_status,
>> .suspend = gen10g_suspend,
>> .resume = gen10g_resume,
>> + .set_loopback = gen10g_loopback,
>> } };
>>
>> static int __init phy_init(void)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/phy.h b/include/linux/phy.h
>> index e76e4ad..fc7a5c8 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/phy.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/phy.h
>> @@ -639,6 +639,7 @@ struct phy_driver {
>> int (*set_tunable)(struct phy_device *dev,
>> struct ethtool_tunable *tuna,
>> const void *data);
>> + int (*set_loopback(struct phy_device *dev, bool enable);
>
> Does this even compile? It looks to be missing a )
My mistake, I will make sure it will compile before sending it.

>
> Also, where is the exported function the MAC driver should call?
Here is a example:
drivers/net/ph/marvell.c
marvell_set_loopback(struct phy_device *dev, bool enable)
{
/* do some device specific setting */
........

return genphy_loopback(dev, enable);
}

I don't know if this makes sense or not?

Best Regards
Yunsheng Lin
>
> Andrew
>
> .
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-21 05:45    [W:0.063 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site