lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: a slight change of compare target in __insert_vmap_area()
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 10:26:06AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>On 2017/6/2 9:45, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 09:55:31AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>>> On 2017/5/26 9:36, Wei Yang wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:04:44AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>>>>> I hit the overlap issue, but it is hard to reproduced. if you think it is safe. and the situation
>>>>> is not happen. AFAIC, it is no need to add the code.
>>>>>
>>>>> if you insist on the point. Maybe VM_WARN_ON is a choice.
>>>>>
>>>> Do you have some log to show the overlap happens?
>>> Hi wei
>>>
>>> cat /proc/vmallocinfo
>>> 0xf1580000-0xf1600000 524288 raw_dump_mem_write+0x10c/0x188 phys=8b901000 ioremap
>>> 0xf1638000-0xf163a000 8192 mcss_pou_queue_init+0xa0/0x13c [mcss] phys=fc614000 ioremap
>>> 0xf528e000-0xf5292000 16384 n_tty_open+0x10/0xd0 pages=3 vmalloc
>>> 0xf5000000-0xf9001000 67112960 devm_ioremap+0x38/0x70 phys=40000000 ioremap
>> These two ranges overlap.
>>
>> This is hard to say where is the problem. From the code point of view, I don't
>> see there is possibility to allocate an overlapped range.
>>
>> Which version of your kernel?
>> Hard to reproduce means just see once?
> yes, just once. I have also no see any problem from the code. The kernel version is linux 4.1.
> but That indeed exist.
>

This is really interesting. While without reproducing the behavior, it is
really costly to debug in the code.

I took a look into my own /proc/vmallocinfo, there are around hundred entries.
Currently, I don't have a clue to dive into the issue.

> Thanks
>zhongjiang
>>> 0xfe001000-0xfe002000 4096 iotable_init+0x0/0xc phys=20001000 ioremap
>>> 0xfe200000-0xfe201000 4096 iotable_init+0x0/0xc phys=1a000000 ioremap
>>> 0xff100000-0xff101000 4096 iotable_init+0x0/0xc phys=2000a000 ioremap
>>>
>>> I hit the above issue, but the log no more useful info. it just is found by accident.
>>> and it is hard to reprodeced. no more info can be supported for further investigation.
>>> therefore, it is no idea for me.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> zhongjinag
>>>
>

--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-05 00:16    [W:0.056 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site