lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 3/6] reset: hide reset control arrays behind struct reset_control
From
Date
Hi Philipp,


On 06/19/2017 05:48 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 12:16 +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> [...]
>>> @@ -102,18 +94,6 @@ static inline struct reset_control *__devm_reset_control_get(
>>> return optional ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static inline
>>> -int reset_control_array_assert(struct reset_control_array *resets)
>>> -{
>>> - return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static inline
>>> -int reset_control_array_deassert(struct reset_control_array *resets)
>>> -{
>>> - return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static inline struct reset_control_array *
>> This has to return just 'struct reset_control *'.
>> That should resolve kbuild errors.
>>
>> Rest looks good to me.
>> Reviewed-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> Thanks, I had already fixed this locally, prompted by the kbuild test
> robot. I'll send a v6. I would like to merge this patch into the first
> "reset: Add APIs to manage array of resets" patch, if that's ok with
> you.

Thanks.
You are right. It makes more sense to merge these two patches
if Jon finds it okay to put reset_control_array behind reset_control.

I am cool with squashing this patch.


Best regards
Vivek

>
> regards
> Philipp
>

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-19 15:06    [W:0.055 / U:3.048 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site