lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 26/44] dma-mapping: remove DMA_ERROR_CODE
Date
And update the documentation - dma_mapping_error has been supported
everywhere for a long time.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt | 31 +++++--------------------------
include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 5 -----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt b/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt
index 979228bc9035..4ed388356898 100644
--- a/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt
+++ b/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt
@@ -550,32 +550,11 @@ and to unmap it:
dma_unmap_single(dev, dma_handle, size, direction);

You should call dma_mapping_error() as dma_map_single() could fail and return
-error. Not all DMA implementations support the dma_mapping_error() interface.
-However, it is a good practice to call dma_mapping_error() interface, which
-will invoke the generic mapping error check interface. Doing so will ensure
-that the mapping code will work correctly on all DMA implementations without
-any dependency on the specifics of the underlying implementation. Using the
-returned address without checking for errors could result in failures ranging
-from panics to silent data corruption. A couple of examples of incorrect ways
-to check for errors that make assumptions about the underlying DMA
-implementation are as follows and these are applicable to dma_map_page() as
-well.
-
-Incorrect example 1:
- dma_addr_t dma_handle;
-
- dma_handle = dma_map_single(dev, addr, size, direction);
- if ((dma_handle & 0xffff != 0) || (dma_handle >= 0x1000000)) {
- goto map_error;
- }
-
-Incorrect example 2:
- dma_addr_t dma_handle;
-
- dma_handle = dma_map_single(dev, addr, size, direction);
- if (dma_handle == DMA_ERROR_CODE) {
- goto map_error;
- }
+error. Doing so will ensure that the mapping code will work correctly on all
+DMA implementations without any dependency on the specifics of the underlying
+implementation. Using the returned address without checking for errors could
+result in failures ranging from panics to silent data corruption. The same
+applies to dma_map_page() as well.

You should call dma_unmap_single() when the DMA activity is finished, e.g.,
from the interrupt which told you that the DMA transfer is done.
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index 4f3eecedca2d..a57875309bfd 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
@@ -546,12 +546,7 @@ static inline int dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)

if (get_dma_ops(dev)->mapping_error)
return get_dma_ops(dev)->mapping_error(dev, dma_addr);
-
-#ifdef DMA_ERROR_CODE
- return dma_addr == DMA_ERROR_CODE;
-#else
return 0;
-#endif
}

#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_DMA_SUPPORTED
--
2.11.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-16 20:13    [W:0.273 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site