lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/6] drivers base/arch_topology: frequency-invariant load-tracking support
Hi,

On 14/06/17 15:08, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 14 June 2017 at 09:55, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/12/2017 04:27 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > On 8 June 2017 at 09:55, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> > Thanks for the review!
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >> @@ -225,8 +265,14 @@ static int __init register_cpufreq_notifier(void)
> > >>
> > >> cpumask_copy(cpus_to_visit, cpu_possible_mask);
> > >>
> > >> - return cpufreq_register_notifier(&init_cpu_capacity_notifier,
> > >> - CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
> > >> + ret = cpufreq_register_notifier(&init_cpu_capacity_notifier,
> > >> + CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
> > >> +
> > >> + if (ret)
> > >
> > > Don't you have to free memory allocated for cpus_to_visit in case of
> > > errot ? it was not done before your patch as well
> >
> > Yes, we should free cpus_to_visit if the policy notifier registration
> > fails. But IMHO also, once the parsing of the capacity-dmips-mhz property
> > is done. free cpus_to_visit is only used in the notifier call
> > init_cpu_capacity_callback() after being allocated and initialized in
> > register_cpufreq_notifier().
> >
> > We could add something like this as the first patch of this set. Only
> > mildly tested on Juno. Juri, what do you think?
> >
> > Author: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> > Date: Tue Jun 13 23:21:59 2017 +0100
> >
> > drivers base/arch_topology: free cpumask cpus_to_visit
> >
> > Free cpumask cpus_to_visit in case registering
> > init_cpu_capacity_notifier has failed or the parsing of the cpu
> > capacity-dmips-mhz property is done. The cpumask cpus_to_visit is
> > only used inside the notifier call init_cpu_capacity_callback.
> >
> > Reported-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
>
> your proposal for freeing cpus_to_visit looks good for me
>
> Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>

Yep, looks good to me too. Thanks for fixing!

Best,

- Juri

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-15 10:29    [W:0.526 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site