Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm: dts: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c device node | From | Matthias Brugger <> | Date | Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:24:57 +0200 |
| |
On 14/06/17 03:11, Jun Gao wrote: > On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 15:45 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: >> >> On 13/06/17 15:23, Jun Gao wrote: >>> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 14:52 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: >>>> >>>> On 13/06/17 12:24, Jun Gao wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:36 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/06/17 13:54, Jun Gao wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:35 +0800, Jun Gao wrote: >>>>>>>> From: Jun Gao <jun.gao@mediatek.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Add MT2701 i2c device node. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Gao <jun.gao@mediatek.com> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+) >>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Matthias, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you take this patch together with >>>>>>> [PATCH v4 1/2]dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> They are both included in the pull request I send [1] [2], or do I miss >>>>>> something? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/729b7f8dbdaff270c53052897ea06486221a49a2 >>>>>> [2] >>>>>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1 >>>>> >>>>> Dear Matthias, >>>>> >>>>> Would you mind to use the same style as follows in i2c-mtk.txt of [2]? >>>>> >>>>> "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701 >>>>> "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577 >>>>> "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589 >>>>> "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623 >>>>> "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>> >>>> You mean I should fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding >>>> description? Or do you mean it should be MTxxxx instead of mtxxxx? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Matthias >>> >>> Dear Matthias, >>> >>> I mean fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding description. Is it OK? >>> >> >> Then I can't see the difference between what you are asking for and what >> is already pushed to the repository. Please send a patch, that will make >> things clearer. >> >> Regards, >> Matthias > > Dear Matthias, > > like this: > > diff: > Required properties: > - compatible: value should be either of the following. > - (a) "mediatek,mt6577-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6577 i2c. > - (b) "mediatek,mt6589-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6589 i2c. > - (c) "mediatek,mt8127-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8127 i2c. > - (d) "mediatek,mt8135-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8135 i2c. > - (e) "mediatek,mt8173-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8173 i2c. > + "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek > MT2701 > + "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577 > + "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589 > + "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek > MT7623 > + "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173 > - reg: physical base address of the controller and dma base, length > of memory > mapped region. > - interrupts: interrupt number to the cpu. >
Please look at [2], this is already staged.
[2] https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1
| |