Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:48:13 +0200 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 11/16] powerpc: vio_cmo: use dev_groups and not dev_attrs for bus_type |
| |
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:23:10PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes: > > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:53:22AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes: > >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:12:10PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> >> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes: > >> >> > >> >> > The dev_attrs field has long been "depreciated" and is finally being > >> >> > removed, so move the driver to use the "correct" dev_groups field > >> >> > instead for struct bus_type. > >> >> > > >> >> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> > >> >> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > >> >> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> > >> >> > Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> > >> >> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> > >> >> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > >> >> > Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> > >> >> > Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> > >> >> > Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> > >> >> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> > >> >> > Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > >> >> > --- > >> >> > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > >> >> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > >> >> > >> >> This one needed a bit more work to get building, the incremental diff is > >> >> below. We need a forward declaration of name, devspec and modalias, > >> >> which is a bit weird, but that's how the code is currently structured. > >> >> And there's dev and bus attributes with the same name, so that needed an > >> >> added "bus". > >> >> > >> >> I booted v2 of patch 10 and this one and everything looks identical to > >> >> upstream. > >> > > >> > Ah, many thanks, this was on my todo list to fix up today. > >> > > >> > But you renamed the sysfs files when you added "bus" to the function > >> > names, are you sure you want to do that? I don't mind, but if you > >> > happen to have userspace tools that look at those files, they just broke > >> > :( > >> > >> Ugh crap, no that won't work. > >> > >> I didn't see it when I tested because my machine doesn't have the CMO > >> feature enabled. > >> > >> I guess we have to open code some of the BUS_ATTR_RO() etc. so we can > >> avoid the name clash. > > > > Or split it into multiple files, I've solved this that way in the past. > > You shouldn't have to "open code" BUS_ATTR_RO(). > > It just requires one use of __ATTR(), which seems simpler than splitting > the file in two.
Ah, yes, nice work, thanks. If you wanted to be really "tricky", you could just use __ATTR_RO() there, but I'll leave it as-is :)
Let's see what 0-day says about this version.
Many thanks for working on this, much appreciated.
greg k-h
| |