lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] firmware: dmi: Check DMI structure length
Hi Andy,

Thanks for the review.

On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:16:05 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote:
> > Before accessing DMI data to record it for later, we should ensure
> > that the DMI structures are large enough to contain the data in
> > question.
>
> > - const u8 *d = (u8 *) dm + index;
> > + const u8 *d;
>
> > + d = (u8 *) dm + index;
>
> I think you may leave this as is and make it compiler's burden to optimize.

Is there any benefit except making the patch smaller?

> > - const u8 *d = (u8 *) dm + index;
> > + const u8 *d;
>
> > + d = (u8 *) dm + index;
>
> Ditto.
>
> > - int i, count = *(u8 *)(dm + 1);
> > + int i, count;
>
> > + count = *(u8 *)(dm + 1);
>
> Ditto.

I would expect a static code analyzer to complain about at least the
last one. Dereferencing a pointer before checking its validity is bad.

I'm not a big fan of counting of compiler optimizations to make the
code right.

--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-01 16:40    [W:0.092 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site