Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 02 Jun 2017 09:18:14 +0800 | From | Jia-Ju Bai <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in b43legacy_attr_interfmode_store |
| |
On 06/02/2017 12:11 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 09:05:07 +0800 > Jia-Ju Bai<baijiaju1990@163.com> wrote: > >> I admit my patches are not well tested, and they may not well fix the bugs. >> I am looking forward to opinions and suggestions :) > May I politely suggest that sending out untested locking changes is a > dangerous thing to do? You really should not be changing the locking in a > piece of kernel code without understanding very well what the lock is > protecting and being able to say why your changes are safe. Without that, > the risk of introducing subtle bugs is very high. > > It looks like you have written a useful tool that could help us to make > the kernel more robust. If you are interested in my suggestion, I would > recommend that you post the sleep-in-atomic scenarios that you are > finding, but refrain from "fixing" them in any case where you cannot offer > a strong explanation of why your fix is correct. > > Thanks for working to find bugs in the kernel! > > jon Hi,
Thanks for your good and helpful advice. I am sorry for my improper patches. I will only report bugs instead of sending improper patches when I have no good solution of fixing the bugs.
Thanks, Jia-Ju Bai
| |