Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 May 2017 16:01:41 -0400 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Implement delayed_work_busy() |
| |
Hello, Alex.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:58:19PM +0200, Alex Naidis wrote: > Yeah, I agree, it is wrong to rely on work_busy() providing correct data. > However sometimes it is useful to have an indicator like this to at least > catch some cases where requeuing work would be obsolete. > This applies for delayed work too.
Can you elaborage on "requeueing work would be obsolate" a bit?
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |