lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: NOMMU: Set ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE for M-class cpus
From
Date
On 23/05/17 21:33, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:16:56AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>> Now, we have dedicated non-cacheable region for consistent DMA
>>> operations. However, that region can still be marked as bufferable by
>>> MPU, so it'd be safer to have barriers by default.
>>
>> What do you actually want here? Your patch doesn't quite make sense,
>> the commit description seems to indicate that you require this option
>> to be set for V7M, but the patch says otherwise.
>>
>>> config ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE
>>> - bool "Use non-cacheable memory for DMA" if (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K) && !CPU_V7
>>> - default y if CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7
>>> + bool "Use non-cacheable memory for DMA" if (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7M) && !CPU_V7
>>
>> This "if" conditional conditionalises the visibility of the option,
>> it doesn't conditionalise the value.
>>
>>> + default y if CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7 || CPU_V7M
>>
>> Taking both of these changes together what you end up with is an option
>> presented to the user for "Use non-cacheable memory for DMA" which
>> they can choose to disable.
>>
>> If you require this option to be set, that's incorrect - your modification
>> to the default line is correct, but the first line is not. To achieve
>> that, you want the if condition to evaluate false for V7M, thereby hiding
>> the option from the user. In that case, the default value will always be
>> assigned to the option.
>
> I had the opposite comment in the previous version ;-)
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/19/185
>
> I think the current patch is correct, but the description could still be
> clarified: On some of the beefier ARMv7-M machines (with DMA
> and write buffers) we want this enabled, while those that didn't
> need it until now also won't need it in the future.

Ok. Do you want it go into commit message or option description or maybe both?

Thanks
Vladimir

>
> Arnd
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-24 10:33    [W:0.065 / U:2.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site