Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 May 2017 14:24:39 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/ACPI/cstate: Allow ACPI C1 FFH MWAIT use on AMD systems |
| |
On Wed 2017-05-17 09:20:19, Yazen Ghannam wrote: > From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com> > > AMD systems support the Monitor/Mwait instructions and these can be used > for ACPI C1 in the same way as on Intel systems, with appropriate BIOS > support. > > Allow ffh_cstate_init() to succeed on AMD systems and make the Cstate > description vendor-agnostic. > > Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c > index 8a908ae..4c5dd5d 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static long acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe_cpu(void *_cx) > cx->type); > } > snprintf(cx->desc, > - ACPI_CX_DESC_LEN, "ACPI FFH INTEL MWAIT 0x%x", > + ACPI_CX_DESC_LEN, "ACPI FFH X86 MWAIT 0x%x", > cx->address); > out: > return retval;
Are you sure no userspace depends on word "INTEL" there?
Does it make sense to include "X86" there? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |