lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/7] DWARF: add the config option
> How are you handling control flow?

Control flow of what?

> > Here's the struct in its current state:
> >
> > #define UNDWARF_REG_UNDEFINED 0
> > #define UNDWARF_REG_CFA 1
> > #define UNDWARF_REG_SP 2
> > #define UNDWARF_REG_FP 3
> > #define UNDWARF_REG_SP_INDIRECT 4
> > #define UNDWARF_REG_FP_INDIRECT 5
> > #define UNDWARF_REG_R10 6
> > #define UNDWARF_REG_DI 7
> > #define UNDWARF_REG_DX 8
> >
>
> Why only those registers? Also, if you have the option I would really
> suggest using the actual x86 register numbers (ax, ex, dx, bx, sp, bp,
> si, di, r8-r15 in that order.)

Those are the only registers which are ever needed as the base for
finding the previous stack frame. 99% of the time it's sp or bp, the
other registers are needed for aligned stacks and entry code.

Using the actual register numbers isn't an option because I don't need
them all and they need to fit in a small number of bits.

This construct might be useful for other arches, which is why I called
it "FP" instead of "BP". But then I ruined that with the last 3 :-)

--
Josh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-19 23:30    [W:0.128 / U:3.768 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site