lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.11 087/114] Revert "f2fs: put allocate_segment after refresh_sit_entry"
Date
4.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

commit c6f82fe90d7458e5fa190a6820bfc24f96b0de4e upstream.

This reverts commit 3436c4bdb30de421d46f58c9174669fbcfd40ce0.

This makes a leak to register dirty segments. I reproduced the issue by
modified postmark which injects a lot of file create/delete/update and
finally triggers huge number of SSR allocations.

[Jaegeuk Kim: Change missing incorrect comment]
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1788,15 +1788,14 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_

stat_inc_block_count(sbi, curseg);

+ if (!__has_curseg_space(sbi, type))
+ sit_i->s_ops->allocate_segment(sbi, type, false);
/*
- * SIT information should be updated before segment allocation,
- * since SSR needs latest valid block information.
+ * SIT information should be updated after segment allocation,
+ * since we need to keep dirty segments precisely under SSR.
*/
refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr);

- if (!__has_curseg_space(sbi, type))
- sit_i->s_ops->allocate_segment(sbi, type, false);
-
mutex_unlock(&sit_i->sentry_lock);

if (page && IS_NODESEG(type))

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-18 13:57    [W:0.315 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site