lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] lockd: remove redundant check on block
Date
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

A null check followed by a return is being performed already, so block
is always non-null at the second check on block, hence we can remove
this redundant null-check (Detected by PVS-Studio). Also re-work
comment to clean up a check-patch warning.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
fs/lockd/svclock.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
index 5581e020644b..3507c80d1d4b 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@ -870,15 +870,15 @@ nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct nlm_cookie *cookie, __be32 status)
if (!(block = nlmsvc_find_block(cookie)))
return;

- if (block) {
- if (status == nlm_lck_denied_grace_period) {
- /* Try again in a couple of seconds */
- nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 10 * HZ);
- } else {
- /* Lock is now held by client, or has been rejected.
- * In both cases, the block should be removed. */
- nlmsvc_unlink_block(block);
- }
+ if (status == nlm_lck_denied_grace_period) {
+ /* Try again in a couple of seconds */
+ nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 10 * HZ);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Lock is now held by client, or has been rejected.
+ * In both cases, the block should be removed.
+ */
+ nlmsvc_unlink_block(block);
}
nlmsvc_release_block(block);
}
--
2.11.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-08 19:10    [W:0.063 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site