lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [media] cec: Handle RC capability more elegantly
From
Date
On 04/04/2017 04:43 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> If a user specifies the use of RC as a capability, they should
> really be enabling RC Core code. If they do not we WARN() them
> of this and disable the capability for them.
>
> Once we know RC Core code has not been enabled, we can update
> the user's capabilities and use them as a term of reference for
> other RC-only calls. This is preferable to having ugly #ifery
> scattered throughout C code.
>
> Most of the functions are actually safe to call, since they
> sensibly check for a NULL RC pointer before they attempt to
> deference it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c | 19 +++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c b/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> index cfe414a..51be8d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> @@ -208,9 +208,13 @@ struct cec_adapter *cec_allocate_adapter(const struct cec_adap_ops *ops,
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> if (WARN_ON(!available_las || available_las > CEC_MAX_LOG_ADDRS))
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + if (WARN_ON(caps & CEC_CAP_RC && !IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)))
> + caps &= ~CEC_CAP_RC;

Don't use WARN_ON, this is not an error of any kind. Neither do you need to add the
'caps & CEC_CAP_RC' test. Really, it's just simpler to do what I suggested before
with an #if.

> +
> adap = kzalloc(sizeof(*adap), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!adap)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> strlcpy(adap->name, name, sizeof(adap->name));
> adap->phys_addr = CEC_PHYS_ADDR_INVALID;
> adap->log_addrs.cec_version = CEC_OP_CEC_VERSION_2_0;
> @@ -237,7 +241,6 @@ struct cec_adapter *cec_allocate_adapter(const struct cec_adap_ops *ops,
> if (!(caps & CEC_CAP_RC))
> return adap;
>
> -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)

Huh? If CONFIG_RC_CORE is undefined, all these rc_ calls will fail when linking!

Regards,

Hans

> /* Prepare the RC input device */
> adap->rc = rc_allocate_device(RC_DRIVER_SCANCODE);
> if (!adap->rc) {
> @@ -264,9 +267,7 @@ struct cec_adapter *cec_allocate_adapter(const struct cec_adap_ops *ops,
> adap->rc->priv = adap;
> adap->rc->map_name = RC_MAP_CEC;
> adap->rc->timeout = MS_TO_NS(100);
> -#else
> - adap->capabilities &= ~CEC_CAP_RC;
> -#endif
> +
> return adap;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cec_allocate_adapter);
> @@ -285,7 +286,6 @@ int cec_register_adapter(struct cec_adapter *adap,
> adap->owner = parent->driver->owner;
> adap->devnode.dev.parent = parent;
>
> -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> if (adap->capabilities & CEC_CAP_RC) {
> adap->rc->dev.parent = parent;
> res = rc_register_device(adap->rc);
> @@ -298,15 +298,13 @@ int cec_register_adapter(struct cec_adapter *adap,
> return res;
> }
> }
> -#endif
>
> res = cec_devnode_register(&adap->devnode, adap->owner);
> if (res) {
> -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> /* Note: rc_unregister also calls rc_free */
> rc_unregister_device(adap->rc);
> adap->rc = NULL;
> -#endif
> +
> return res;
> }
>
> @@ -337,11 +335,10 @@ void cec_unregister_adapter(struct cec_adapter *adap)
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(adap))
> return;
>
> -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> /* Note: rc_unregister also calls rc_free */
> rc_unregister_device(adap->rc);
> adap->rc = NULL;
> -#endif
> +
> debugfs_remove_recursive(adap->cec_dir);
> cec_devnode_unregister(&adap->devnode);
> }
> @@ -357,9 +354,7 @@ void cec_delete_adapter(struct cec_adapter *adap)
> kthread_stop(adap->kthread);
> if (adap->kthread_config)
> kthread_stop(adap->kthread_config);
> -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> rc_free_device(adap->rc);
> -#endif
> kfree(adap);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cec_delete_adapter);
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-04 16:52    [W:0.087 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site