Messages in this thread | | | From | "Ghannam, Yazen" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce/AMD: Carve out SMCA bank configuration | Date | Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:37:34 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:bp@alien8.de] > Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 9:46 AM > To: Ghannam, Yazen <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> > Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org; Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>; > x86@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce/AMD: Carve out SMCA bank configuration > > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 01:34:42PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote: > > I'd like to keep the functions separate since they're logically > > independent. I can define something like smca_configure() as a wrapper > > function that can contain current and future SMCA related functions. Is this > okay? > > Are you planning to call the one and not the other in some path?
No, not at the moment. This patch is just to help with readability.
Thanks, Yazen
| |