lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] regulator: Allow for asymmetric settling times
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:32:09PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Saturday 29 April 2017 05:36 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:

> > -- regulator-settling-time-us: Settling time, in microseconds, for voltage
> > - change if regulator have the constant time for any level voltage change.
> > - This is useful when regulator have exponential voltage change.
> > +- regulator-settling-time-up-us: Settling time, in microseconds, for voltage
> > + increase if the regulator needs a constant time to settle after voltage
> > + increases of any level. This is useful for regulators with exponential
> > + voltage changes.
> > +- regulator-settling-time-down-us: Settling time, in microseconds, for voltage
> > + decrease if the regulator needs a constant time to settle after voltage
> > + decreases of any level. This is useful for regulators with exponential
> > + voltage changes.

> Can we have regulator-settling-time-us also so if it is there then up/down
> same.
> If up/down different then separate properties can be used.

Removing the existing binding would also break existing DTs using it
which we obviously don't want. I don't see any reason to even deprecate
it, like Laxman says it's nice and convenient for people with symmetric
performance.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-30 14:31    [W:0.044 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site