Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:27:31 -0400 (EDT) | From | Nicolas Pitre <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] minitty: a minimal TTY layer alternative for embedded systems |
| |
On Mon, 3 Apr 2017, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I like the idea of mintty (if it supported ptys).
In fact PTYs could probably be implemented like another UART driver for the master side.
But that may come later.
> Except for that (and possibly VT) it is unlikely that people really > rely on the obsolete terminal features from the 70ies. So it's a kind > of cleanup.
I wouldn't push for replacing the existing code though. It is stable and full featured. The mini version may well never be fully standard compliant to keep the code small.
Nicolas
| |