Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: SATA: Fine-tuning for two function implementations | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Date | Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:30:29 +0200 |
| |
> Hmmm, allocs -> callocs. Are these actually beneficial? If so, why? > Because one multiplication is rolled into the call?
Did the previous size calculations contain the general possibility for integer overflows? https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/190.html
* Will the computed values usually stay within the limits of the used data types so far?
* How much do you care for corresponding checks and source code annotations by functions like “devm_kcalloc”?
Regards, Markus
| |