Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:41:51 -0400 | From | Rich Felker <> | Subject | Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility |
| |
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 03:14:21PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > > On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> > > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100 > > > >> I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those "standard > >> names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on __GLIBC__, > >> and *that* isn't right either. > > > > Yep, that's something that needs correcting. > > > Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__
Absolutely not.
Rich
| |