lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [musl] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 03:14:21PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
>
> On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100
> >
> >> I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those "standard
> >> names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on __GLIBC__,
> >> and *that* isn't right either.
> >
> > Yep, that's something that needs correcting.
> >
> Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__

Absolutely not.

Rich

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-21 20:47    [W:0.033 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site