lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v13 03/10] mux: minimal mux subsystem and gpio-based mux controller
From
Date
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 16:32 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-04-21 16:23, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 18:43 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > [...]
> >> +int mux_chip_register(struct mux_chip *mux_chip)
> >> +{
> >> + int i;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < mux_chip->controllers; ++i) {
> >> + struct mux_control *mux = &mux_chip->mux[i];
> >> +
> >> + if (mux->idle_state == mux->cached_state)
> >> + continue;
> >
> > I think this should be changed to
> >
> > - if (mux->idle_state == mux->cached_state)
> > + if (mux->idle_state == mux->cached_state ||
> > + mux->idle_state == MUX_IDLE_AS_IS)
> > continue;
> >
> > or the following mux_control_set will be called with state ==
> > MUX_IDLE_AS_IS. Alternatively, mux_control_set should return when passed
> > this value.
>
> That cannot happen because ->cached_state is initialized to -1
> in mux_chip_alloc, so should always be == MUX_IDLE_AS_IS when
> registering. And drivers are not supposed to touch ->cached_state.
> I.e., ->cached_state is "owned" by the core.

So this was caused by me filling cached_state from register reads in the
mmio driver. Makes me wonder why I am not allowed to do this, though, if
I am able to read back the initial state?

regards
Philipp

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-21 19:02    [W:0.077 / U:8.764 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site