lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility
From
Date
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 15:14 +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100
> >
> > >
> > > I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those
> > > "standard
> > > names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on
> > > __GLIBC__,
> > > and *that* isn't right either.
> > Yep, that's something that needs correcting.
> >
> Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__ or could we at least
> switch the kernel UAPI to !__KERNEL__ here?

I'd start with the patch I referenced yesterday...[unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-21 15:19    [W:0.041 / U:1.588 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site