lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility
From
Date


On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100
>
>> I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those "standard
>> names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on __GLIBC__,
>> and *that* isn't right either.
>
> Yep, that's something that needs correcting.
>
Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__ or could we at least
switch the kernel UAPI to !__KERNEL__ here?

Hauke

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-21 15:15    [W:0.040 / U:40.412 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site