lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] arm64: allwinner: a64: add NMI controller on A64
在 2017-04-20 13:58,Maxime Ripard 写道:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 06:56:43PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>
>>
>> 于 2017年4月18日 GMT+08:00 下午3:00:16, Maxime Ripard
>> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> 写到:
>> >On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 07:57:37PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> >> Allwinner A64 SoC features a NMI controller, which is usually
>> >connected
>> >> to the AXP PMIC.
>> >>
>> >> Add support for it.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
>> >> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> Changes in v2:
>> >> - Added Chen-Yu's ACK.
>> >>
>> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
>> >b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
>> >> index 05ec9fc5e81f..53c18ca372ea 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
>> >> @@ -403,6 +403,14 @@
>> >> <GIC_SPI 41 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> + nmi_intc: interrupt-controller@01f00c0c {
>> >> + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-sc-nmi";
>> >> + interrupt-controller;
>> >> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>> >> + reg = <0x01f00c0c 0x38>;
>> >
>> >The base address is not correct, and there's uncertainty on whether
>> >this is this particular controller or not. Did you even test this?
>>
>> Tested by axp20x-pek.
>
> Still, the base address is wrong, which is yet another hint that this
> is not the same interrupt controller, and just works by accident.

No, it's the same as other post-sun6i device trees.
See other post-sun6i device trees: (or maybe they're all wrong, but
as we have no document for it, we should temporarily keep them)

sun6i-a31.dtsi
```
nmi_intc: interrupt-controller@01f00c0c {
compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-sc-nmi";
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
reg = <0x01f00c0c 0x38>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
};
```

sun8i-a23-a33.dtsi
```
nmi_intc: interrupt-controller@01f00c0c {
compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-sc-nmi";
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
reg = <0x01f00c0c 0x38>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
};
```

But according to the BSP device tree, the base address should be
0x01f00c00. Should I send some patch to fix all of them? (but it will
break device tree compatibility)

>
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-20 09:04    [W:0.064 / U:11.344 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site