lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [backport v4.9] tpm_tis: use default timeout value if chip reports it as zero
From
Date
Hi Jarkko,

On 15.04.2017 17:26, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
>
> Since commit 1107d065fdf1 ("tpm_tis: Introduce intermediate layer for
> TPM access") Atmel 3203 TPM on ThinkPad X61S (TPM firmware version 13.9)
> no longer works. The initialization proceeds fine until we get and
> start using chip-reported timeouts - and the chip reports C and D
> timeouts of zero.
>
> It turns out that until commit 8e54caf407b98e ("tpm: Provide a generic
> means to override the chip returned timeouts") we had actually let
> default timeout values remain in this case, so let's bring back this
> behavior to make chips like Atmel 3203 work again.
>
> Use a common code that was introduced by that commit so a warning is
> printed in this case and /sys/class/tpm/tpm*/timeouts correctly says the
> timeouts aren't chip-original.
>
> Fixes: 1107d065fdf1 ("tpm_tis: Introduce intermediate layer for TPM access")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Backport v4.9. Can you test it?
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 2 +-
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 6 ++--
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> index 3a9149cf0110..4c914fe25802 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
(..)
> @@ -537,16 +537,15 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> goto duration;
> }
>
> - if (be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.return_code) != 0 ||
> - be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.length)
> - != sizeof(tpm_cmd.header.out) + sizeof(u32) + 4 * sizeof(u32))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -

Is this part right?
These tests weren't removed by this commit as present in the mainline kernel.

Maciej

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-15 18:04    [W:1.401 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site