Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] includes: dt-bindings: Rename STM32F429 pinctrl DT bindings | From | Alexandre Torgue <> | Date | Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:31:01 +0200 |
| |
Hi Rob,
On 04/10/2017 10:27 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: >> STM32F4 MCU series is composed of several SOC (STM32F429, STM32F469, ...). >> Most of muxing definition are identical. So to avoid to duplicate bindings >> definition, this patch create common definitions. > > This is a lot of churn. Some confirmation that the resultant dtb is the > same before and after would be nice. Perhaps the script you used to > convert this as well.
I tried to use fdtdump but it seems bugged. So I used directly dtc binary to (re)generate dts files (before and after apply the series) and I compared "pinmux" field in both case.
Example on stm32f469-disco:
./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-after.dts stm32f469-disco-after.dtb
./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-before.dts stm32f469-disco-before.dtb
cat stm32f469-disco-after.dts | grep pinmux cat stm32f469-disco-before.dts | grep pinmux
regards alex
> > Rob >
| |