lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [regression v4.11] 617f01211baf ("8139too: use napi_complete_done()")
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 11:38:49AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 21:17 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My old P3 laptop started to die on me in the middle of larger compile
> > jobs (using distcc) after v4.11-rc<something>. I bisected the problem
> > to 617f01211baf ("8139too: use napi_complete_done()").
> >
> > Unfortunately I wasn't able to capture a full oops as the machine doesn't
> > have serial and ramoops failed me. I did get one partial oops on vgacon
> > which showed rtl8139_poll() being involved (EIP was around
> > _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore() supposedly), so seems to agree with my
> > bisect result.
> >
> > So maybe some kind of nasty thing going between the hard irq and
> > softirq? Perhaps UP related? I tried to stare at the locking around
> > rtl8139_poll() for a while but it looked mostly sane to me.
> >
>
> Thanks a lot for the detective work, I am so sorry for this !
>
> Could you try the following patch ?
>
> I do not really see what could be wrong, the code should run just fine
> on UP.
>
> Thanks.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/8139too.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/8139too.c
> index 89631753e79962d91456d93b71929af768917da1..cd2dbec331dd796f5296cd378561b3443f231673 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/8139too.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/8139too.c
> @@ -2135,11 +2135,12 @@ static int rtl8139_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> if (likely(RTL_R16(IntrStatus) & RxAckBits))
> work_done += rtl8139_rx(dev, tp, budget);
>
> - if (work_done < budget && napi_complete_done(napi, work_done)) {
> + if (work_done < budget) {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&tp->lock, flags);
> - RTL_W16_F(IntrMask, rtl8139_intr_mask);
> + if (napi_complete_done(napi, work_done))
> + RTL_W16_F(IntrMask, rtl8139_intr_mask);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tp->lock, flags);
> }
> spin_unlock(&tp->rx_lock);
>
>

Yep, that patch does appear to make it stable again.

Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-10 14:11    [W:0.082 / U:0.956 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site