Messages in this thread | | | From | Joakim Tjernlund <> | Subject | different xxx_bit() function prototypes in bitops for x86 vs generic | Date | Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:11:22 +0000 |
| |
Building virtualbox external kernel modules warns about different types, example: include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h; set_bit_le(int nr, const void *addr) vs arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h: set_bit(long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
This difference is causes complaints, changing set_bit_le(int nr, const void *addr) to set_bit_le(int nr, const unsigned long *addr) makes the warnings go away for this function.
Should not these two be the same?
| |