Messages in this thread | | | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Date | Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:16:09 +0100 | Subject | Re: v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null) |
| |
Hi Pavel,
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > On Thu 2017-03-09 10:38:46, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: >> > Well, I have fast CPUs, but most of the time they just compile >> > stuff. Especially bisect is compile-heavy. I suspect going back to >> > gcc-3.2 would bring me bigger advantages than CPU upgrade... >> >> I hope you do use ccache or distcc? > > I tried to use distcc before, but it was rather hard to maintain. No > ccache here. Hmm. I guess ccache really makes sense for bisect.
Yes it does. So if you're not using it yet, do the below, today, not tomorrow.
If your distro supports it, prepend /usr/lib/ccache/ to your $PATH. Create symlinks from the names of your favorite cross-compilers to /usr/bin/ccache, and make sure they are early in your $PATH.
That's it! Enjoy!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |