Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Andrey Ryabinin <> | Subject | [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() | Date | Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:27:17 +0300 |
| |
vfree() can be used in any atomic context now, thus there is no point in vfree_atomic(). This reverts commit 8d5341a6260a ("x86/ldt: use vfree_atomic() to free ldt entries")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c index d4a1583..f09df2f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void free_ldt_struct(struct ldt_struct *ldt) paravirt_free_ldt(ldt->entries, ldt->size); if (ldt->size * LDT_ENTRY_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE) - vfree_atomic(ldt->entries); + vfree(ldt->entries); else free_page((unsigned long)ldt->entries); kfree(ldt); -- 2.10.2
| |