Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Date | Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:42:26 +0300 |
| |
On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 18:33 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > HI, > > On 28-03-17 17:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 13:21 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should > > > immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to > > > parsing > > > unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block. > > > > +Cc: Hans. > > > > Hans, do have any objections on this? Would you ideally give your > > Tested-by? > > Looks good to me and also does not seem to break anything on my test > devices, so: > > Acked-and-Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Thanks!
Linus, I'm fully satisfied :-)
> > Regards, > > Hans > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 4 +++- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib- > > > acpi.c > > > index a3faefa44f68..d3f9f028a37b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > > > @@ -572,8 +572,10 @@ struct gpio_desc *acpi_find_gpio(struct > > > device > > > *dev, > > > } > > > > > > desc = acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(adev, propname, > > > idx, > > > &info); > > > - if (!IS_ERR(desc) || (PTR_ERR(desc) == > > > -EPROBE_DEFER)) > > > + if (!IS_ERR(desc)) > > > break; > > > + if (PTR_ERR(desc) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > > > + return ERR_CAST(desc); > > > } > > > > > > /* Then from plain _CRS GPIOs */ > > > -- > > > 2.12.1.500.gab5fba24ee-goog > > > > > >
-- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy
| |