lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: phy: handle state correctly in phy_stop_machine
From
Date
On 03/22/2017 01:27 PM, Zach Brown wrote:
> From: Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@ni.com>
>
> If the PHY is halted on stop, then do not set the state to PHY_UP. This
> ensures the phy will be restarted later in phy_start when the machine is
> started again.

So essentially what you want to "defeat" here is entering phy_start()
with PHY_UP therefore not run this part:

case PHY_HALTED:
/* make sure interrupts are re-enabled for the PHY */
if (phydev->irq != PHY_POLL) {
err = phy_enable_interrupts(phydev);
if (err < 0)
break;
}

phydev->state = PHY_RESUMING;
do_resume = true;
break;

which is what re-enables interrupts and makes sure the PHY is resumed,
right?

If that's the scenario, I guess:

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@ni.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brad Mouring <brad.mouring@ni.com>
> Acked-by: Xander Huff <xander.huff@ni.com>
> Acked-by: Kyle Roeschley <kyle.roeschley@ni.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> index 7cc1b7d..fe2d4c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ void phy_stop_machine(struct phy_device *phydev)
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&phydev->state_queue);
>
> mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
> - if (phydev->state > PHY_UP)
> + if (phydev->state > PHY_UP && phydev->state != PHY_HALTED)
> phydev->state = PHY_UP;
> mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
> }
>


--
Florian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-23 22:42    [W:0.055 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site