lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] printk: introduce printing kernel thread
    On Wed 2017-03-22 18:59:20, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:45:50PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
    > > sysrq is potentially even trickier. can we always wake_up() kernel
    > > thread from sysrq? there probably might be cases when we can't rely
    > > on the scheduler.
    >
    > sysrq runs from interrupt context, right? Should be able to do wakeups.

    It would make sense to actually switch to the old mode when
    handling sysrq. At least for some requests that are used
    for debugging when the system is not responsible.

    It is pity that it is the irq context that is prone to
    softlocks. But this might be the only way to actually
    see the messages.

    Tetsuo already suggested to use the old mode for SysRq-t, see
    https://lkml.kernel.org/r/201612261954.FJE69201.OFLVtFJSQFOHMO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp

    Best Regards,
    Petr

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-03-23 13:02    [W:6.007 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site