| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 4.9 56/93] PCI: Decouple IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE and PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE | Date | Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:51:31 +0100 |
| |
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
[ Upstream commit 7a6d312b50e63f598f5b5914c4fd21878ac2b595 ]
Remove the assumption that IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE == PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE. PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE is the ROM enable bit defined by the PCI spec, so if we're reading or writing a BAR register value, that's what we should use. IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE is a corresponding bit in struct resource flags.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> --- drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev, mask64 = (u32)PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK; } } else { - res->flags |= (l & IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE); + if (l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE) + res->flags |= IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE; l64 = l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK; sz64 = sz & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK; mask64 = (u32)PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
|