lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.9 56/93] PCI: Decouple IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE and PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE
Date
4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 7a6d312b50e63f598f5b5914c4fd21878ac2b595 ]

Remove the assumption that IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE == PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE.
PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE is the ROM enable bit defined by the PCI spec, so if
we're reading or writing a BAR register value, that's what we should use.
IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE is a corresponding bit in struct resource flags.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev,
mask64 = (u32)PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
}
} else {
- res->flags |= (l & IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE);
+ if (l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE)
+ res->flags |= IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE;
l64 = l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
sz64 = sz & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
mask64 = (u32)PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-20 19:21    [W:0.375 / U:1.156 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site