lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 01/18] arm64: Allow checking of a CPU-local erratum
Date
this_cpu_has_cap() only checks the feature array, and not the errata
one. In order to be able to check for a CPU-local erratum, allow it
to inspect the latter as well.

This is consistent with cpus_have_cap()'s behaviour, which includes
errata already.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index abda8e861865..6eb77ae99b79 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1090,20 +1090,29 @@ static void __init setup_feature_capabilities(void)
* Check if the current CPU has a given feature capability.
* Should be called from non-preemptible context.
*/
-bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap)
+static bool __this_cpu_has_cap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap_array,
+ unsigned int cap)
{
const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps;

if (WARN_ON(preemptible()))
return false;

- for (caps = arm64_features; caps->desc; caps++)
+ for (caps = cap_array; caps->desc; caps++)
if (caps->capability == cap && caps->matches)
return caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU);

return false;
}

+extern const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[];
+
+bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap)
+{
+ return (__this_cpu_has_cap(arm64_features, cap) ||
+ __this_cpu_has_cap(arm64_errata, cap));
+}
+
void __init setup_cpu_features(void)
{
u32 cwg;
--
2.11.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-20 18:50    [W:0.179 / U:7.524 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site