lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/17] arm64: arch_timer: Get rid of erratum_workaround_set_sne
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:26:11AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Let's move the handling of workarounds affecting set_next_event
> to the affected function, instead of overwriding the pointers

Nit: overriding

> as an afterthough. Yes, this is an extra indirection on the
> erratum handling path, but the HW is busted anyway.

[...]

> +#define erratum_set_next_event_tval_virt(...) ({BUG_ON(1); 0;})
> +#define erratum_set_next_event_tval_phys(...) ({BUG_ON(1); 0;})

Nit: BUG()

[...]

> {
> + if (needs_unstable_timer_counter_workaround())
> + return erratum_set_next_event_tval_virt(evt, clk);
> +
> set_next_event(ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_ACCESS, evt, clk);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -487,6 +490,9 @@ static int arch_timer_set_next_event_virt(unsigned long evt,
> static int arch_timer_set_next_event_phys(unsigned long evt,
> struct clock_event_device *clk)
> {
> + if (needs_unstable_timer_counter_workaround())
> + return erratum_set_next_event_tval_phys(evt, clk);
> +
> set_next_event(ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_ACCESS, evt, clk);
> return 0;
> }

I take it that the new conditionals are NOPs in the !erratum case, so
this doesn't adversely affect the usual case.

Thanks,
Mark.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-20 15:51    [W:0.400 / U:0.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site