lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] usb: hub: Fix error loop seen after hub communication errors
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> While stress testing a usb controller using a bind/unbind looop, the
> following error loop was observed.
>
> usb 7-1.2: new low-speed USB device number 3 using xhci-hcd
> usb 7-1.2: hub failed to enable device, error -108
> usb 7-1-port2: cannot disable (err = -22)
> usb 7-1-port2: couldn't allocate usb_device
> usb 7-1-port2: cannot disable (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
> ** 57 printk messages dropped ** hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
> ** 82 printk messages dropped ** hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
>
> This continues forever. After adding tracebacks into the code,
> the call sequence leading to this is found to be as follows.
>
> [<ffffffc0007fc8e0>] hub_activate+0x368/0x7b8
> [<ffffffc0007fceb4>] hub_resume+0x2c/0x3c
> [<ffffffc00080b3b8>] usb_resume_interface.isra.6+0x128/0x158
> [<ffffffc00080b5d0>] usb_suspend_both+0x1e8/0x288
> [<ffffffc00080c9c4>] usb_runtime_suspend+0x3c/0x98
> [<ffffffc0007820a0>] __rpm_callback+0x48/0x7c
> [<ffffffc00078217c>] rpm_callback+0xa8/0xd4
> [<ffffffc000786234>] rpm_suspend+0x84/0x758
> [<ffffffc000786ca4>] rpm_idle+0x2c8/0x498
> [<ffffffc000786ed4>] __pm_runtime_idle+0x60/0xac
> [<ffffffc00080eba8>] usb_autopm_put_interface+0x6c/0x7c
> [<ffffffc000803798>] hub_event+0x10ac/0x12ac
> [<ffffffc000249bb8>] process_one_work+0x390/0x6b8
> [<ffffffc00024abcc>] worker_thread+0x480/0x610
> [<ffffffc000251a80>] kthread+0x164/0x178
> [<ffffffc0002045d0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
>
> kick_hub_wq() is called from hub_activate() even after failures to
> communicate with the hub. This results in an endless sequence of
> hub event -> hub activate -> wq trigger -> hub event -> ...
>
> Provide two solutions for the problem.
>
> - Only trigger the hub event queue if communication with the hub
> was successful.
> - After a suspend failure, only resume already suspended interfaces
> if the communication with the device is still possible.
>
> Each of the changes fixes the observed problem. Use both to improve
> robustness.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> v3: In hub.c, abort immediately if hub_port_status() returns an error.
> Since hub_port_status() already logs the error, don't log it again.
> In device,c, log the error return value from usb_suspend_device()
> if usb_get_status() failed as well.
> Don't check if the hub is still accessible if the error returned
> from hub_port_status() is -EBUSY.
> v2: Instead of not triggering the hub wq after an error to submit an urb,
> implement a more complex error detection and handling. Do it in two
> places. Marked as RFC to determine if one (or both) of those solutions
> are viable.
>
> drivers/usb/core/driver.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>




> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
> index cdee5130638b..7ebdf2a4e8fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
> @@ -1331,6 +1331,24 @@ static int usb_suspend_both(struct usb_device *udev, pm_message_t msg)
> */
> if (udev->parent && !PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg))
> status = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the device is inaccessible, don't try to resume
> + * suspended interfaces and just return the error.
> + */
> + if (status && status != -EBUSY) {
> + int err;
> + u16 devstat;
> +
> + err = usb_get_status(udev, USB_RECIP_DEVICE, 0,
> + &devstat);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&udev->dev,
> + "Failed to suspend device, error %d\n",
> + status);
> + goto done;
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> /* If the suspend failed, resume interfaces that did get suspended */
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index 5a420657f9f7..5ab7cd09e1a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> @@ -1066,6 +1066,9 @@ static void hub_activate(struct usb_hub *hub, enum hub_activation_type type)
>
> portstatus = portchange = 0;
> status = hub_port_status(hub, port1, &portstatus, &portchange);
> + if (status)
> + goto abort;
> +
> if (udev || (portstatus & USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION))
> dev_dbg(&port_dev->dev, "status %04x change %04x\n",
> portstatus, portchange);
> @@ -1198,7 +1201,7 @@ static void hub_activate(struct usb_hub *hub, enum hub_activation_type type)
>
> /* Scan all ports that need attention */
> kick_hub_wq(hub);
> -
> +abort:
> if (type == HUB_INIT2 || type == HUB_INIT3) {
> /* Allow autosuspend if it was suppressed */
> disconnected:
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-17 17:31    [W:0.048 / U:0.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site