lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 3/7] perf/sdt: Directly record SDT events with 'perf record'
From
Date


On Wednesday 15 March 2017 06:46 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 01:03:31PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:36:54PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>>> +static int record__parse_events_option(const struct option *opt,
>>> + const char *str,
>>> + int unset)
>>> +{
>>> + if (is_sdt_event((char *) str))
>>> + return parse_sdt_events_option(opt, str, unset);
>>> + else
>>> + return parse_events_option(opt, str, unset);
>> so what happens if there're more than one event in 'str' like:
>> -e cycles,std_...
>>
>> would it be better to plug this directly into parse-events.y
>> parser.. and handle it like any other event type?
> Yeah, I went to bed thinking about this :-)
>
> Ravi,
>
> Please test something like:
>
> perf record -e cycles,sdt_glib:mem__alloc,sched:*switch -a sleep 5s

Thanks Jiri, Arnaldo,

Yeah, this is failing :)

$ sudo ./perf record -a -e sdt_libpthread:mutex_release,sced:*switch
Error: sdt_libpthread:mutex_release,sched:*switch not found in the cache
invalid or unsupported event: 'sdt_libpthread:mutex_release,sched:*switch'

Actually I tested with 'perf record -e ev1 -e ev2', but in this case
record__parse_events_option will get called separately for each
individual event.

Anyway, I'll fix this in next version.

Thanks for the review,
Ravi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-15 14:51    [W:0.075 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site