lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [v2, 4/4] dt-bindings: mtd: Add Octal SPI support to Cadence QSPI.
From
Date
On 03/10/2017 01:03 PM, Artur Jedrysek wrote:
>
>> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marek.vasut@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 10 March 2017 04:39
>> On 03/08/2017 09:05 AM, Artur Jedrysek wrote:
>>> This patch updates Cadence QSPI Device Tree documentation to include
>>> information about new compatible used to indicate, whether or not
>>> Octal SPI transfers are supported by the device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Artur Jedrysek <jartur@cadence.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changelog:
>>> v2: Use new compatible, instead of boolean property, to indicate
>>> Octal SPI support.
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/cadence-quadspi.txt | 4 +++-
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/cadence-quadspi.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/cadence-quadspi.txt
>>> index f248056..41d1e98 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/cadence-quadspi.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/cadence-quadspi.txt
>>> @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
>>> * Cadence Quad SPI controller
>>>
>>> Required properties:
>>> -- compatible : Should be "cdns,qspi-nor".
>>> +- compatible : Should be "cdns,{qspi|ospi}-nor".
>>
>> Please explicitly list all compatibles , ie.
>> Should be "cdns,qspi-nor" or "cdns,ospi-nor".
>>
>
> Two possible options are also explicitly listed right below. I did that
> in the way it was done in other driver for Cadence IP:
> /Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/macb.txt
> Should I remove all of that and replace it with both options, separated
> by an "or" word?

Wait for Rob to confirm.

>> But I think the ospi is backward compatible with qspi, right ? So the
>> binding for ospi should list both, ie.
>> compatible = "cdns,ospi-nor", "cdns,qspi-nor";
>>
>
> Yes, the ospi is backwards compatible with qspi. However, the sole point
> of introducing new compatible was to differentiate between them (which
> was previously done using a boolean flag, but that was criticized).
> Listing both bindings for ospi would only help for kernels not
> containing driver update being subject of this patch series, as both
> ospi and qspi are handled by the same driver - just with a slight
> difference. I apologize if I got something wrong here.

You got it right, I was just curious about the compatibility.

>>> + Use "cdns,qspi-nor" for Quad SPI controller.
>>> + Use "cdns,ospi-nor" for Octal SPI controller.
>>> - reg : Contains two entries, each of which is a tuple consisting of a
>>> physical address and length. The first entry is the address and
>>> length of the controller register set. The second entry is the
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Marek Vasut


--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-10 13:53    [W:0.074 / U:1.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site