lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    From
    Date
    Subject[PATCH 3.16 102/370] fs/notify/inode_mark.c: use list_next_entry in fsnotify_unmount_inodes
    3.16.42-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

    ------------------

    From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>

    commit 1deaf9d19776916cd1c83191503bf327319a301a upstream.

    To make the intention clearer, use list_next_entry instead of
    list_entry.

    Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>
    Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
    ---
    fs/notify/inode_mark.c | 3 +--
    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

    --- a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
    +++ b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
    @@ -298,8 +298,7 @@ void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct list
    break;
    }
    spin_unlock(&next_i->i_lock);
    - next_i = list_entry(next_i->i_sb_list.next,
    - struct inode, i_sb_list);
    + next_i = list_next_entry(next_i, i_sb_list);
    }

    /*
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-03-10 15:04    [W:4.368 / U:0.580 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site