lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/3] nvmem: sunxi-sid: add support for H3's SID controller
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:13:37PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> The H3 SoC have a bigger SID controller, which has its direct read
> address at 0x200 position in the SID block, not 0x0.
>
> Also, H3 SID controller has some silicon bug that makes the direct read
> value wrong at cold boot, add code to workaround the bug. (This bug has
> already been fixed on A64 and later SoCs)
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>
> ---
> This patch is the part of [PATCH v2 1/1] that adds support for H3 SID
> controller.
>
> .../bindings/nvmem/allwinner,sunxi-sid.txt | 12 +++-
> drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/allwinner,sunxi-sid.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/allwinner,sunxi-sid.txt
> index d543ed3f5363..9ab9e75a6351 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/allwinner,sunxi-sid.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/allwinner,sunxi-sid.txt
> @@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
> Allwinner sunxi-sid
>
> Required properties:
> -- compatible: "allwinner,sun4i-a10-sid" or "allwinner,sun7i-a20-sid"
> +- compatible: Should be one of the following (depending on your SoC):
> + "allwinner,sun4i-a10-sid"
> + "allwinner,sun7i-a20-sid"
> + "allwinner,sun8i-h3-sid"
> +
> - reg: Should contain registers location and length
>
> = Data cells =
> @@ -19,3 +23,9 @@ Example for sun7i:
> compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-sid";
> reg = <0x01c23800 0x200>
> };
> +
> +Example for sun8i-h3:
> + sid@01c14000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-sid";
> + reg = <0x01c14000 0x400>;
> + };
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c b/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
> index 69524b67007f..476a161ff23a 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,16 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/random.h>
>
> +/* Registers and special values for doing register-based SID readout on H3 */
> +#define SUN8I_SID_PRCTL 0x40
> +#define SUN8I_SID_RDKEY 0x60
> +
> +#define SUN8I_SID_OP_LOCK 0xAC
> +#define SUN8I_SID_OFFSET_MASK 0x1FF
> +#define SUN8I_SID_OFFSET_SHIFT 16
> +#define SUN8I_SID_LOCK_SHIFT 8
> +#define SUN8I_SID_READ BIT(1)
> +
> static struct nvmem_config econfig = {
> .name = "sunxi-sid",
> .read_only = true,
> @@ -34,11 +44,14 @@ static struct nvmem_config econfig = {
> };
>
> struct sunxi_sid_cfg {
> + u32 value_offset;
> u32 size;
> + bool need_register_readout;
> };
>
> struct sunxi_sid {
> void __iomem *base;
> + u32 value_offset;
> };
>
> /* We read the entire key, due to a 32 bit read alignment requirement. Since we
> @@ -51,7 +64,8 @@ static u8 sunxi_sid_read_byte(const struct sunxi_sid *sid,
> {
> u32 sid_key;
>
> - sid_key = ioread32be(sid->base + round_down(offset, 4));
> + sid_key = ioread32be(sid->base + sid->value_offset +
> + round_down(offset, 4));

This would probably be more logical to have this in sunxi_sid_read.

> sid_key >>= (offset % 4) * 8;
>
> return sid_key; /* Only return the last byte */
> @@ -69,6 +83,33 @@ static int sunxi_sid_read(void *context, unsigned int offset,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int sun8i_sid_register_readout(const struct sunxi_sid *sid,
> + const unsigned int word,
> + u32 *out)
> +{
> + u32 reg_val;
> + unsigned long expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(250);
> +
> + /* Set word, lock access, and set read command */
> + reg_val = (word & SUN8I_SID_OFFSET_MASK)
> + << SUN8I_SID_OFFSET_SHIFT;
> + reg_val |= SUN8I_SID_OP_LOCK << SUN8I_SID_LOCK_SHIFT;

You're not using those mask and shifts anywhere else, why not just
define the value / macro you need directly?

> + reg_val |= SUN8I_SID_READ;
> + writel(reg_val, sid->base + SUN8I_SID_PRCTL);
> +
> + do {
> + reg_val = readl(sid->base + SUN8I_SID_PRCTL);
> + } while (time_before(jiffies, expire) && (reg_val & SUN8I_SID_READ));

readl_poll_timeout?

> + if (reg_val & SUN8I_SID_READ)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + if (out)
> + *out = readl(sid->base + SUN8I_SID_RDKEY);

Why do you need that out parameter?

Thanks,
Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-06 10:14    [W:0.045 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site