lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:13:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> wrote:
>> > > Darren, Andy,
>> > >
>> > > Please drop this patch series for now. I will send a rebased v2 after a
>> > > long overdue patch series from Alan Jenkins gets applied in a reworked
>> > > form.
>> >
>> > Noted.
>> >
>> > Just for you information. Our repo now consists three branches: fixes,
>> > for-next, and testing. testing is kinda for internal use, it might be
>> > broken or be in a wrong state.
>> > Better to use for-next as a base. For this cycle (which is my first as
>>
>> In general, you should be able to use Linus' master as the base. Only if you
>> require patches already in for-next, should you use for-next.
>
> Thanks, guys, this is all helpful information. I have always assumed
> testing was the correct base branch because my patches got pushed there
> once they got accepted.

Consider testing as a purgatory of the stuff.

P.S. Darren fixed your name in previous patches and thus one more
rebase happened in for-next.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-04 15:12    [W:1.968 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site