lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: regression for m68k/coldfire
From
Date
Le 03/02/2017 à 01:35, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 02/03/2017 01:10 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> This is a limitation in the FEC support in QEMU.
>> This works on real ColdFire hardware (which do support the
>> FEC MIB stats registers from offset 0x200 - so not 5272).
>> I sent this patch to the qemu dev list a couple of weeks
>> back which fixes qemu:
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-01/msg01781.html
>>
>> I do not believe it has been picked up by QEMU mainline yet
>> (I will probably have to resend and push a little to get that done).
>
> QEMU upstream can sometimes take a while before they are merging patches,
> but usually it helps containing the maintainer of this part of the
> source tree directly.
>
> Unfortunately, mcf5208 is currently unmaintained [1]:
>
> mcf5208
> S: Orphan
> F: hw/m68k/mcf5208.c
> F: hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c
> F: hw/char/mcf_uart.c
> F: hw/net/mcf_fec.c
>
> But you can try getting into touch with Laurent Vivier who is the
> new maintainer of the m68k target. I have CC'ed him.
>
> Adrian
>
>> [1] http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=MAINTAINERS
>

Use scripts/get_maintainer.pl on your patch to find the people.

This patch is on the network part, so you should cc:
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> (odd fixer:Network devices)

If you cc me, you add more chances to have a review ;)

Thanks,
Laurent

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-03 09:19    [W:0.064 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site