Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:42:05 +0100 | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 05/25] clocksource: owl: Add S900 support |
| |
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 06:16:10PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Daniel, > > Am 28.02.2017 um 07:35 schrieb Andreas Färber: > > The Actions Semi S900 SoC provides four 32-bit timers, TIMER0/1/2/3, > > but no 2Hz timers. > > > > Deal with the S500 having less timers. > > > > An S900 datasheet can be found in 96Boards documentation: > > https://github.com/96boards/documentation/blob/master/ConsumerEdition/Bubblegum-96/HardwareDocs/SoC_bubblegum96.pdf > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> > [...] > > @@ -126,10 +127,20 @@ static irqreturn_t owl_timer1_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) > > static const struct owl_timer_info s500_timer_info = { > > .timer_offset[0] = 0x08, > > .timer_offset[1] = 0x14, > > + .timer_offset[2] = -1, > > + .timer_offset[3] = -1, > > +}; > > + > > +static const struct owl_timer_info s900_timer_info = { > > + .timer_offset[0] = 0x08, > > + .timer_offset[1] = 0x14, > > + .timer_offset[2] = 0x30, > > + .timer_offset[3] = 0x3c, > > }; > > I noticed later that the S900 manual describes TIMER2/3 as "used only in > Secure mode". My driver code resetting them seems to work though. > > Should we just drop these extra timer initializations then to make the > driver simpler and more performant again? I'd still like to keep the two > compatible strings in the DT though, and we may want to disable the 2Hz > timers on S500 just in case.
Yes, makes sense.
> -- > SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
| |