lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: sched_setaffinity causing "rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP" warning.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 03:06:35PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb, at 05:19:03PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Looks like fallout from cb42c9a3ebbbb23448c3f9a25417fae6309b1a92
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 561 at kernel/sched/sched.h:812 set_next_entity+0x11d/0x350
> > rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP
> > CPU: 1 PID: 561 Comm: trinity-c36 Not tainted 4.10.0-think+ #6
> > Call Trace:
> > dump_stack+0x4f/0x73
> > __warn+0xcb/0xf0
> > warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80
> > set_next_entity+0x11d/0x350
> > set_curr_task_fair+0x2b/0x60
> > do_set_cpus_allowed+0x138/0x180
> > __set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x106/0x250
> > sched_setaffinity+0x24c/0x2b0
> > ? sched_setaffinity+0x5/0x2b0
> > SyS_sched_setaffinity+0x7a/0xc0
> > do_syscall_64+0x61/0x170
> > entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
> > RIP: 0033:0x7f461db010f9
> > RSP: 002b:00007fff76d320a8 EFLAGS: 00000246
> > ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000cb
> > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000000cb RCX: 00007f461db010f9
> > RDX: 00007f461ba30000 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: 0000000000000234
> > RBP: 00007f461e0d4000 R08: 00000000000000a6 R09: 00000000000000cf
> > R10: fffffffffffffffb R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
> > R13: 00007f461e0d4048 R14: 00007f461e1d7ad8 R15: 00007f461e0d4000
>
> Should be fixed here,
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=sched/urgent&id=a499c3ead88ccf147fc50689e85a530ad923ce36
>
> It'll hopefully be sent to Linus soonish since it's in the
> sched/urgent branch.

I pushed that
commit 7925851af123091a2590110e28ea268840ebd177
Author: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue Feb 21 23:52:55 2017 -0800

sched/fair: Update rq clock before changing a task's CPU affinity
to our CI, and we still see the splat
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/CI_DRM_2251/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html

Anything else in that branch that might be the fix?
-Chris

--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-28 14:44    [W:0.040 / U:1.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site