lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [LKP] [lkp-developer] [sched/fair] 4e5160766f: +149% ftq.noise.50% regression
Hi Ying,

On 21 February 2017 at 03:40, Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi, Vincent,
>
> Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> writes:
>

[snip]

>>>
>>> Here is the test result,
>>>
>>> =========================================================================================
>>> compiler/cpufreq_governor/freq/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/samples/tbox_group/test/testcase:
>>> gcc-6/powersave/20/x86_64-rhel-7.2/100%/debian-x86_64-2016-08-31.cgz/6000ss/lkp-hsw-d01/cache/ftq
>>>
>>> commit:
>>> 4e5160766fcc9f41bbd38bac11f92dce993644aa: first bad commit
>>> 09a43ace1f986b003c118fdf6ddf1fd685692d49: parent of first bad commit
>>> b524060933c546fd2410c5a09360ba23a0fef846: with fix patch above
>>>
>>> 4e5160766fcc9f41 09a43ace1f986b003c118fdf6d b524060933c546fd2410c5a093
>>> ---------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
>>> %stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
>>> \ | \ | \
>>> 3463 ± 10% -61.4% 1335 ± 17% -3.0% 3359 ± 2% ftq.noise.50%
>>> 1116 ± 23% -73.7% 293.90 ± 30% -23.8% 850.69 ± 17% ftq.noise.75%
>>
>> To be honest, I was expecting at least the same level of improvement
>> as the previous patch if not better but i was not expecting worse
>> results
>
> What's your next plan for this regression? At least your previous patch
> could recover part of it.

I haven't been able to find better fix than the previous patch so i'm
going to send a clean version with proper commit message

Regards,
Vincent

>
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-27 10:53    [W:0.154 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site